Surgeons - Medical Professionals - Private Clinics -
\
10th March 2022
\
4 mins read
Share:
Examination of patients is essential to a clinician’s role, including intimate examinations, and examinations of vulnerable patients. Examinations are routine for clinicians, but many patients are unfamiliar with the process, and can find them distressing. The GMC’s Good Medical Practice states at 47 “You must treat patients as individuals and respect their dignity and privacy”, and appropriate use of chaperones can help achieve that.
Chaperones are also an aspect of risk management. While sadly there are clinicians who violate a patient’s trust during an examination, there are also patients who will make unmeritorious allegations against an innocent clinician. Regardless of whether the patient has genuinely misinterpreted an innocent action, or is maliciously making a false allegation for gain, the presence of a reliable witness can be valuable protection for clinicians.
Incision members have access to detailed written guidance materials on this important topic, and this article contains extracts. Incision members also have access to a 24/7 medico-legal/notifications helpline so that they always have access to guidance on individual incidents, or tailored guidance for their specific practice.
What is the key guidance?
The key guidance is in the GMC’s 2013 guidance note “Intimate examinations and chaperones” Intimate examinations and chaperones (gmc-uk.org). But what about video or other remote consultations, given the significant increase in remote consultations in recent years? NHS England published, “Key principles for intimate clinical assessments undertaken remotely in response to COVID-19” key_principles_for_intimate_clinical_assessments_undertaken_remotely_in_response_to_covid19_v1-(1).pdf (gmc-uk.org) It recommends that you should update your chaperone and safeguarding policies to include remote consultations, and confirms that the GMC guidance applies to video consultations. It also addresses some practicalities by commenting, “a chaperone could be present with the practitioner (either virtually or in the same room) [to] witness the nature and extent of the video examination that was undertaken. The chaperone should be visible to the patient.” Also, “if a chaperone is not available (for example because you are remote working) or declined by the patient, use your professional judgement and carefully consider whether a remote examination method should proceed.”
The CQC’s guidance is within their guidance on GPs, but much it would apply equally to clinicians – GP mythbuster 15: Chaperones | Care Quality Commission (cqc.org.uk). This highlights the importance of chaperones receiving the right training, and that non-clinical staff who carry out chaperone duties, “may need a DBS [Disclosure and Barring Service] check”.
Clinicians who only examine patients in private clinics or hospitals managed by others (independent clinicians with practising privileges) should familiarise themselves with the chaperone policy in each hospital or clinic they work at, and know which staff can be available to fulfil that role. Clinicians who examine patients in their own clinics, and Clinic managers, will be responsible for ensuring that their clinic has a robust chaperone policy, including clear and timely communication to patients that they are entitled to one. The clinician or Clinic manager will also need to ensure that there are suitable people in the clinic with the training to be able to carry out the role, and for making sure that the chaperone is ‘impartial’ and empowered to speak up on the patient’s behalf.”
“Such an allegation can lead to police investigations or GMC investigations (for GMC-regulated clinicians), and potentially CQC investigations into Clinics.
Plain English?
Is the word “chaperone” in the healthcare context is overdue for a 21st century plain English overhaul? Is this somewhat antiquated word always understood by patients? Would “Dignity and Safeguarding Attendant” better describe this vital role? Let us know about any alternative phrases coming into use, or your own suggestions!
What about insurance?
The presence of a chaperone cannot necessarily prevent an allegation of inappropriate behaviour or assault, but their witness evidence should make it much easier for the clinician to prove their version of events. Such an allegation can lead to police investigations or GMC investigations. The Incision policies contain cover for the cost of legal advice and representation in police or GMC investigations, and all clinicians should check that they have this vital type of cover.
Related Content
Sporting Medicine in 2026: The Hidden Medico-Legal Pressures Clinicians Must Navigate
by Jared - 3 mins read
Sports medicine in 2026 will be even more intense, more commercial, and more legally exposed than it was just a year ago...
Sports medicine in 2026 will be even more intense, more commercial, and more legally exposed than it was just a year ago. Clinicians aren’t simply treating injuries; they’re operating inside a fast-moving, high-pressure ecosystem where every decision carries medical, ethical, and legal consequences.
The 2026 Reality: Higher Stakes, Higher Scrutiny
The new year’s landscape brings sharper pressures:
Bigger commercial stakes: Athlete performance now directly influences multi-year sponsorships and broadcast deals. Medical decisions can shift financial outcomes overnight.
Stronger athlete rights: Contracts and welfare standards now give athletes more leverage to question or legally challenge unsafe decision-making.
Tighter regulations: New concussion rules, duty-of-care requirements, and independent review panels mean clinicians face closer oversight.
Sports medicine in 2026 is a public and legally accountable arena.
Where Clinicians Face the Biggest Risks Now
1. Documentation failures
Still, the number-one cause of medico-legal trouble. If the rationale isn’t recorded, it’s indefensible.
2. Conflicting expectations
Athletes want to play. Coaches want performance. Clubs want a return on investment. But the clinician’s only obligation is athlete safety; anything else increases risk.
3. Concussion and long-term brain health
With updated 2026 protocols and stricter league enforcement, even minor deviations carry major liability.
4. Risk and consent misunderstandings
Athletes expect full transparency, and miscommunication is still the fastest path to dispute.
5. Scope creep under performance pressure
Clinicians are being pulled into performance decision-making beyond their training. It’s risky, undocumented, and legally fragile.
Why Medico-Legal Awareness Is Essential in 2026
This year demands clinicians who understand both the medicine and the legal framework in which they operate. It’s not enough to make the right call; you must also:
prove it
document it
communicate it clearly
defend it if challenged
Medico-legal awareness is now a core clinical skill. It protects the athlete, the clinician, the club, and the integrity of the entire decision-making process.
In 2026, sports medicine isn’t just about injury management; it’s about navigating a high-stakes, legally charged environment where every decision counts. Clinicians who combine sharp clinical judgment with strong medico-legal awareness are not just protecting themselves; they’re safeguarding athletes, clubs, and the integrity of the sport. Being proactive, documenting thoroughly, communicating clearly, and maintaining professional independence isn’t optional; it’s essential. In this landscape, the safest clinician is the one who plans for both the medical and legal implications of every call.
Stay protected in an ever-changing medico-legal landscape. Our tailored indemnity solutions safeguard your practice, partner with Incision and gain true peace of mind.
Spilling The Tea with Dr Nev Davies - Consent in Surgical Practice
by Jared - 4 mins read
Consent in Surgical Practice: A Common-Sense Approach
As an orthopaedic surgeon with 15 years of experience in both the...
Consent in Surgical Practice: A Common-Sense Approach
As an orthopaedic surgeon with 15 years of experience in both the NHS and private practice, I know that getting the consent process right is about far more than just ticking a box. It’s about clear communication, managing expectations, and ultimately protecting both the patient and yourself.
In the past two years as the complaints lead for our Trauma and Orthopaedic Department, I’ve gained valuable insight into the patient perspective. One thing has become clear: medicolegal claims around consent are rarely about the complication itself—they’re about patients feeling they weren’t properly informed beforehand.
Consent as a Continuum
One of the biggest misconceptions I’ve seen over the years is the idea that consent happens when the patient signs a form. In reality, it’s an ongoing dialogue that should start well before the day of surgery. Patients need time to process information, weigh their options, and ask questions. A rushed conversation just before heading to theatre is one of the easiest ways to land yourself in trouble.
The Legal Standard – What Patients Need to Know
SinceMontgomery v Lanarkshire(2015), the legal framework has shifted toward a more patient-centred approach. We are now expected to disclose any risks that a reasonable patient would find significant—not just the ones we as clinicians think are important. This means tailoring the discussion to the individual.
A young athlete may be most concerned about returning to sport, while an older patient may prioritise pain relief over full mobility. Over the years, I’ve found that actively listening to what matters most to the patient is key to ensuring consent is meaningful.
How to Make Consent Work for You
1. Start Early – The first meaningful discussion should happen in clinic, well before surgery. Patients need time to reflect and, if necessary, involve family members. On the day of surgery, consent should be a recap, not a brand-new conversation.
2. Keep It Simple – Avoid medical jargon. Analogies, sketches, and my plastic knee model make a big difference. A well-explained risk is far less likely to lead to a complaint later.
3. Discuss Alternatives Properly – Patients must be made aware of non-surgical options, even if surgery is clearly the best course of action. If they decline surgery, document that they understand the risks of doing nothing.
4. Be Honest About Risks – No operation is risk-free. If a rare but serious complication exists, I mention it. Every patient undergoing knee replacement under my care is consented forloss of life. If a patient is particularly anxious about a specific risk, I ensure this is documented.
5. Manage Expectations – One of the most common sources of complaints I’ve seen is a mismatch between patient expectations and the actual outcome. I always make sure my knee replacement patients understand that improvement is a process, not an overnight fix.
6. Document Thoroughly – The consent form alone is not enough. All my surgical patients receive a specific consent information leaflet well before their procedure. I ask them to read, digest, sign, and bring it with them on the day of surgery—separate from the hospital’s standard consent form. If a dispute arises years later, thorough documentation is your best protection.
Pitfalls That Can Lead to Claims
Over the years, I’ve seen common mistakes that put clinicians at risk:
Delegating complex consent discussions – While junior staff can handle routine cases, high-risk procedures require direct consultant involvement.
Taking consent too close to surgery– If a patient hasn’t had adequate time to reflect, consent could be challenged as invalid.
Inconsistent messaging– If different team members contradict each other, it creates doubt and potential liability. The whole team must be aligned on key messages.
Not explaining worst-case scenarios – Even rare risks must be mentioned if they are serious. Patients are far more likely to accept complications if they were informed beforehand.
Summary
A well-informed patient who feels listened to is much less likely to complain if something doesn’t go to plan. Good consent is about clarity, honesty, and thorough documentation. The time you invest in doing it properly will not only strengthen patient trust but also significantly reduce your medicolegal risk.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.